Visit the Forum >>
Visit the Classifieds >>

NEWER POST

Nichole Finds a Hilarious City Sign

OLDER POST

Photos From PoPville

Judging Buildings – Catholic University

DSCN8980

Wow, I think they did a really good job with this addition. You can hardly tell it is new from a distance.

DSCN8979

It is from the Dominican House of Studies building:

DSCN8983

Think they did a good job?

DSCN8981

And for those that want to see an old school 70s style artist studios, check it out after the jump.

DSCN8975

Category: Architecture, Brookland, Buildings

By: | 13 May 2009 3:00 PM | 15 Comments

  • Sure I can tell that it’s new. Those Darth Vader windows are horrible. Why bother to replicate the proportions and massing of the original and then get the windows so bluntly wrong and unattractive.

  • Irving Streete

    All the architectural integrity of a Fairfax County McMansion. They did the architect no favor by putting it right next to a building which got the proportions right and relies on real stonework and at least a few decent architectural details.

  • not telling

    the windows area an obvious giveaway. i suppose they could have done worse.

  • shy

    The vinyl siding and gutters add that 1990s look.

    How do older buildings handle this? I don’t see the downspouts on the old building.

    They left off a story.

  • eric in ledroit

    it’s horrendous. the windows are completely ridiculous. all in all, very sad because they obviously spent a ton of money on that stonework front.

    and i can’t believe they have siding on it! thanks for pointing that out. EWW.

  • eric in ledroit

    that said i LOVE LOVE LOVE those artist spaces. brookland has such a great feel.

  • JohnnyReb

    i agree with the general consensus: Why go to all the trouble and expense of replicating the original building in material and scale, only to say “screw you!” and put in horrible, horrible, looking windows? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?!

  • Disaffected in DC

    PoP, you should have rung the doorbell and asked to see the chapel. The altarpiece or reredos is just astonishingly beautiful.

    The Dominican House of Studies, btw, is not part of Catholic Unversity. It’s formal title is the “Pontifical Faculty of the Immaculate Conception.” The word “Pontifical” means that it is authorized or accredited to grant academic degrees in sacred studies by the Holy See. Many of the seminaries around Catholic University, like St. Paul’s College (Paulist) on 4th Street, are also separate academic institutions from CUA. They are, in this sense, different from, say, Oxford and Cambridge, which have Catholic seminaries as private halls of studies within the University e.g., Blackfriars or Greyfriars. The Theological College next door to the Dominican House is, however, a part of CUA. It is operated by the Society of St. Sulpice.

  • Victoriam

    Wow – I happened to drive by there just yesterday and noticed it – (how could you not!) it is transcendentally awful – unless it is meant to be a sort of post-modern joke? I could live with that I suppose

    Would really love to hear from an actual architecht who might give us some insight into how awful buildings get made. (Or if they don’t actually think this is awful – why is it good?) I think most of us at least sort of understand how bad movies get made, but a building?

  • schweeney

    Paging Howard Roark! Victoriam has a question for you.

  • not telling

    The architect is DeLizzio Architects and Planners.

    Here is a newsletter that was published at some point early in the design process.

    http://www.opfriars.org/dominican-foundation/newsletter/onepurpose-2006-v2-no1.pdf

    Looking at this it would appear that proper proportions and detailing were at one time part of the design and were eliminated somewhere along the way.

  • Victoriam

    Thanks for the link not telling – but the original sketch doesn’t look all that better.

    If you’re going modern – especially as an addition to a traditional building – then go modern – as the Corcoran design. http://www.arcspace.com/architects/gehry/corcoran/

    And I’m not sure I’d want to listen to Howard Roark very long, he always seemed insufferable, even at the peak of my adolescent Ayn Rand phase. Didn’t he blow up his building because they put balconies on it? I kind of like balconies.

  • Anonymous

    Looks a lot like some Michael Graves atrocity.

  • Mac

    “hardly tell it is new”?? It looks Photoshopped, for chrissake!

  • Anonymous

    This is nothing but a message board for bitter people. People, it’s a freakin’ building . . . Relax!



NEWER POST

Nichole Finds a Hilarious City Sign

OLDER POST

Photos From PoPville

113

COMMENTS

66

COMMENTS

PoPville Photo Archives Caption Contest

07 February 2012 1:29 PM

63

COMMENTS

62

COMMENTS

59

COMMENTS

MK
7:06pm

Winnie and Teddy are so adorable. How old are they?

Your Afternoon Animal Fix
7:03pm

Happy Birthday Charles Dickens! Not a lot has changed.

Thurs. Afternoon Rental Option – U Street
6:42pm

Orange kitties are psycho- I have one and he's nuts. Adorable, but nuts.

Your Afternoon Animal Fix
6:18pm

Yeah, that right there would have me walking out the door. Nothing says "You'll...

Thurs. Afternoon Rental Option – U Street
6:13pm

Columbia Heights and Georgia Ave opened on the same day.

List of Metro’s 20 worst escalators – Georgia Ave #1